Wednesday, 23 January 2013

TRAUMA OF APARTHEID IN NADINE GORDIMER’S MY SON’S STORY

Indian Streams Research Journal 

Impact Factor:0.2105

 TRAUMA OF APARTHEID IN NADINE GORDIMER’S MY SON’S STORY

Arfan Hussain
Research Scholar
IIT, Guwahati
Contact No: 9954374067

ABSTRACT    

W. E. B. Du Bois says, “The problem of the Twentieth Century is the problem of the color line.”        This problem of color line is best reflected in Nadine Gordimer’s novel My Sons Story. The system of apartheid, i.e. the legally sanctioned system of ethnic segregation, pervaded South African culture as well as its laws. The “white one” policy prohibited blacks from holding many jobs; they were not allowed to run business in any areas. Public swimming pools, libraries, hotels, shops, park benches etc all were divided between black and white people where a white man got the utmost preference and facilities than a black one. Nadine Gordimer’s novel responds this political situation and My Son’s Story is the best manifestation of the hidden wounds of apartheid, its unseen scars and silent scourge.  “You see”, once Gordimer says, “In South Africa, society is the political situation”. So nobody can evade from the prevailing truths of the socio-political atmosphere and the story authentically shows how a family consisting of four members, has been shattered by the political state of affairs i.e., apartheid.
The system of Apartheid was one of the overwhelming oppression in South Africa that engulfed each and every family of the society. This system pervaded South African culture as well as its laws. The “white only” policy prohibited blacks from holding many job; they were not allowed to run businesses or professional practices in any areas designated for whites only. Schools, buses, hospitals, beaches, trains were segregated. During the time of Apartheid, each South African day saw an average of   145 rapes and 752 serious assaults out of its 42 million populations. The new crime was the rape of babies; some AIDS-infected African men believed that having sex with a virgin is a cure. There were more than 59 murders a day. It led the world in child and baby rapes, to say nothing of adult rapes. The number of white farmers and their families, including children, were targeted, brutally tortured and sadistically murdered on their own farms or in their own houses, some 4,000 since apartheid ended in 1994, literally making farming in South Africa the most dangerous occupation in the world. Car-jacking were a daily occurrence with drivers frequently kidnapped and murdered. Commonplace home invasions and robberies forced people to live like prisoners in homes protected by walls, electric fences, trained dogs, hired guards, alarm systems, motion detectors inside and out, safe rooms and, if they’re able, weapons – although they’re illegal.  In Swellendam, a small town of Western Cape, whites had their own cemetery and non-whites are not allowed to be buried there.
 Apartheid made itself felt in the way writers in South Africa responded to the social and political situation around them. There were writers, black as well as white, like Nadine Gordimer, who argued for the critical importance of giving politics a natural place in fiction rather than simply propagandizing in fiction.

     Nadine Gordimer's role as a white woman writer in South Africa has elicited a substantial measure of controversy. During the apartheid years, Nadine Gordimer was one of the most outspoken advocates for racial equality, a characteristic that turned her into a persona non grata with South Africa's white leaders.  Through imagination Gordimer explains many complex aspects of human lives. Her novels shed light on the specific consequences of the historical circumstances of life in South Africa. Representing the physical and psychological conditions of her homeland, Nadine Gordimer's fiction scrutinizes the movement from the repressive, enforced order of apartheid through the chaotic interregnum. This dynamic motion between order and disorder reverberates continuously through the recurring images of disintegration, the psychological development of characters, and the overarching plot structure of her novels. Turbulence, irregularity, and unpredictability predominate, but beneath the surface chaos lie complex revelations about basic human motivations and behavioral patterns. Nadine Gordimer, whose narratives blurs the boundaries of history and fiction, has created debate on the issue of the values of the past, national culture and political situations. This writer is considered by many as an interpreter of South African reality, and many read her fiction primarily for its vivid record of life in a controversial country. (Magarey, Kevin. 1974. "Facets of Art in Nadine Gordimer's Short Stories."
Southern Review 7: 3-28.)
   Nadine Gordimer has for many years been a great and gallant keeper of the White South-African conscience. She continued to fulfil this role in the novel My Son’s Story.  It tells the story of the effect of apartheid on one black family in South Africa. The book describes well the complexities of relationships- between the son, Will, and his father, Sonny; between Sonny and his wife Aila; between Sonny and his lover Hannah, between everyone and the political situation at hand.  Will, who is a young man, finds out that his father is having a relationship with a white woman Hannah. He is a "colored" schoolteacher who has become a hero in the struggle against apartheid. Throughout the whole book we get to read about Will's feelings about his father and how horrified he is about him having another woman. Gordimer very skilfully presents a real picture of African family in this novel and tries to expose that in South Africa society is a political situation. To paraphrase, one might say politics is character –in South Africa. The racial segregation and discrimination, which could be seen in larger scale throughout the country, also has its manifestation in Sony’s family which has ravaged all family relationships thereby disintegrated the bond of love among them. My Son’s Story is set at the point where the personal intersects the political. This is the inevitable consequence of life in a country like South Africa, where the personal cannot be separated from the political. The novel is about love, family and marriage in the context of the post Soweto society of segregated South Africa in the 70s, and so, it is both a story of domestic manner (the triangle of two women and a man, or of father, mother and son) and a political novel of contemporary urban South Africa. Sony’s journey from a simple teacher to disloyal person of having affair with a white human rights advocate Hannah Plowman, final revelation of active participation of Will’s sister and mother in the struggle against apartheid, etc all can be seen as a consequence of the sustaining upheaval in the African society that has shattered Will’s conception of life .Both Hannah and Sonny are concerned about the shape of the new future that awaits the country in the midst of political turmoil. The political strategies include not only direct attack on the government, but also building up opposition to its policies, social military and economic throughout the world. Apartheid permeates Sony and his wife Aila’s life so completely that they almost come to see it as a part of the nature of things. Sony becomes the one sent to help people who lived in wretched conditions in the ghettos. The ugly realities of police state machinery become evident to Sonny and Will at a very personal level, when Aila is arrested for her revolutionary activities to help black people under the Internal Securities Act.
   The narrative voice in My Son's Story is rendered ambiguous by the pronoun of the title, which suggests that the novel is composed by the father in the voice he imagines for his son. Will, as a writer, becomes the interpreter of Sonny's life. Interestingly enough, it may be argued that the main story being told is not "my son's story" or "my father's story," but that it is "my mother's story" which silently occupies the text. The narrative technique of the novel has been highly praised as follows:

“It's a brilliant device: the novel becomes not a series of internal monologues, but the effort of the family's most articulate victim to conjecture, to comprehend, what really happened to them all. It turns a bleak ending into one that suggests how social as well as personal redemption may lie in acts of selflessness, empathy and forgiveness. Writing the novel was such an act. I think Will gives the title to his father, "My Son's Story," because the voice isn't really his anymore, but Gordimer must also mean it to imply a larger wrenched-apart family than Sonny's.”(Flower, Dean. 1991. "Not Waving but Drowning" (Review of My Son's Story).

   

Will reveals in the last chapter that he wrote the story in order to understand: knowledge and acceptance of his destiny comes only through writing his story. In the last chapter Will himself answers the question of whose story is being told, linking it to the sense of writing literature: "It's an old story —ours. My father’s had and mines...” (Gordimer Nadine; My Son’s Story). Will's narrative strategy is Gordimer's evidence that a writer can penetrate the lives of people who have experiences the writer cannot share. It enables Gordimer to write from the point of view of a black character. Gordimer was conscious of her limitations as a white writer, but through Will she imagines her way into a world which she can only have experienced tangentially. Gordimer has depicted the mind of a black person from an inner perspective that makes us consider the South African problem from a personal as well as a political point of view. Moreover, Will's intimate drama of personal conflict parallels the public struggle taking place in South Africa; the tension of black South Africans between public politics, jail, violence, and committing oneself, at the cost of one's family's peace; between fighting with the prospect of certain defeat, and not fighting at all.

Conclusion:
    The role of literature in a society is that of a mirror reflecting its politics, values and culture or challenging what it perceives as its evils. The system of apartheid was one of overwhelming oppression. Hence, it is not surprising that the literature being written at that time was a literature of protest. Throughout the apartheid years, most writers were caught up in the culture of resistance. Black protest described the terrible conditions blacked lived in and suggested ways of overthrowing the government, while white protest dwelt on the guilt feelings of well-meaning, but powerless whites and tried to define what their role should be in a liberated black south Africa. Nadine Gordimer’s attempt to write about black African lives is itself a way to cross the colour line, a way to claim a place for the white people like herself, in the future black-ruled South Africa. When the white South-African writers like Jack Cope, Doris Lessing, Nadine Gordimer etc refer to black protagonist, they do so as outsiders with an even more limited knowledge of the native’s everyday experience than the black writers have. As a native –born South African, Gordimer takes apartheid as her main subject throughout her carrier and My Son’s Story is the best reflection of her ideas. The story finally indicates that once black and white stand on the same level, only then will healthy cross-racial relationship became possible.






Works Cited:

1.      Welsh David. The Rise and Fall of Apartheid, Jonathan Ball Publishers, Cape Town, 2009
2.      Njabulo S. Ndebele, “ Rediscovery of the Ordinary”, South African Literature and Culture (Manchester University Press)1994
3.      David Ward, Chronicles of Darkness(Rout ledge),1989
4.      Gordimer Nadine, The Conservationist(Jonathan Cape 1974),p 124
5.      Flower, Dean. 1991. "Not Waving but Drowning" (Review of My Son's Story).
6.      Magarey, Kevin. 1974. "Facets of Art in Nadine Gordimer's Short Stories."
7.      Southern Review 7: 3-28.
8.      Pushpa Naidu Parekh and Siga Fatima Jagne,ed,Post Colonial African Writers; Bio-Bibliographical Critical Sourcebook (Fitzroy Dearborn,1988,p 191
 

         In my paper, an attempt has been made to show how apartheid  in South Africa  becomes a major force to destroy all family relationship. It also tries to peep into the South African world to disclose the cruelty and dehumanising effects of apartheid not only on black community but also on the white revolutionaries like the writer herseilf, who opposed apartheid and dedicated themselves for the cause of blacks. The cross racial relationship is best reflected in My Son’s Story.